Below are some favorite quotations from Victor Serge's Midnight in the Century
"I don't completely understand your distinction between good and bad Thermidoreans."
"He liked her. He didn't know if he loved her, exactly. We live that way, without knowing."
Two days later they arrested him. Just like that, in the street, near the trolley stop.
Two Trostkyists, one genuine, the other doubtful, were quietly discussing Radek's objections to the theory of permanent revolution.
"I'm charged with espionage. And I'm only a poor slob, citizens and comrades, I swear to you, only a poor slob!"
"It's over. What a bitch of a life. When will it end?"
The elder replied sententiously:
"The Permanent Session of Chaos No. 16. continues. Next point on the agenda."
Men existed here in sharp relief, the accumulated hours crushed them, but time per se did not exist."
"We have nothing, nothing in common with Menshevism."
"You're not a bad guy, but you're a born rat. I'm not worried about the solidity of your skull-bone: you're destined to have an honorable career in the concentration camps."
"Anyone want to write to the Proletarian authorities?"
"If our houses of detention are overcrowded, it's not the fault of the proletarian dictatorship but that of the counter-revolution which assails us on every side."
It all began with a dull pain in the area of the heart. But was it in the area of the heart? We don't know precisely where the heart is nor what it is.
Control yourself--it's just a heart attack--and if it were something worse?
He lost his calendar, the addition of weeks and months, and decided to live outside time.
"Do you know the difference between a great misfortune and a national disaster, Zina Valentinova? Imagine a very great leader falling to the sidewalk from the eighth floor balcony of the Central Committee. That would be a great misfortune. Now imagine him surviving. That would be a national disaster."
The glaciers are starts smashed across the earth.
The revolution will be stranded on the beach for the next twenty years.
"We're between two counter-revolutions. How clear can anything be!"
His brains were spread over the dandelions, but his pince-nez glasses, their frame mended with black thread, were still perched on the bridge of his nose.
"Comrade Ryzhik's report on the joys of boreal springtime is adopted without debate, unanimously with one abstention: mine. I have ideological reservations."
",,,I request a three-second recess for Karl's latest revelation (may his revolutionary's soul rest in peace: His body is rotting slowly in the toilet of the General Secretary's office).
"Listen, brother, I'm uneasy. There are five of us--and not one informer! Do you think that's possible?"
"And what does homo sovieticus need beyond a thousand roubles a month?"
Pessimism, in our age of disciplined energy, is perhaps in involuntary form of sabotage.
"We're right, comrades. Right, like stones are right to be hard, like the grass i right to grow, for the Revolution doesn't want to die out."
"And for the moment the dialectic of history has placed us under its wheel."
Miorzly, every limb alert in that embrace, watched that hand reaching for murder with prodigious shrewdness, seized it on the wing as it clenched its face.
You don't hit a man when he's down, but you can hit a man when he's falling, before he hits the ground.
"Citizen Chief, I'm a Civil War Communist, wounded at the age of eighteen on the Orenburg front. I hope that's enough for you."
"I very much regret that it isn't."
On the scale of history, of what importance are these little sufferings, this senseless resistance of micro-organisms in a drop of water?
She always had that absent air at work. Is she married? The Interim Director considers her for a short moment with the bizarre attention of a solitary man who suffers from liver-trouble, smokes too much, and whom a sad woman has walked out on...
"Subjectively, perhaps they are still revolutionaries. Objectively, they are hardened counter-revolutionaries."
"How do you say son-of-a-bitch in Marxist terms?"
"Got shot, that brother, a little while back. Was really too fat to hide himself nowadays now that everyone else got thin."
He demanded an extremely conspicuous zeal from his subordinates, in order that it should be noticed. What, indeed, is the use of unnoticed zeal?
"Your establishment is hardly on par with socialism, citizen chief. Beginning with the bedbugs."
This blog tracks my personal obsession with the Soviet revolutionary experience. Soviet Roulette is a diary, intellectual journal, series of creative writing exercises, notes for a novel, reading list, therapeutic enterprise, autobiography, extended love letter to Russia, forum for informal book reviews, chaotic sketch of a course syllabus, and "tribute band" to Russia's best historians.
Showing posts with label Midnight in the Century. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Midnight in the Century. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 3, 2018
Monday, October 1, 2018
Victor Serge's Midnight in the Century
Victor Serge produced many first class political books, historical works, and novels. Thus far, I've been most impressed with Serge's Memoirs of a Revolutionary, which gave me a deep appreciation for the cosmopolitan Serge's political, aesthetic, literary, philosophical, and moral talents. Although Serge's Midnight in the Century covers same themes as that non-fiction masterpiece, it isn't his best novel. While too overtly polemical to be a great novel, Serge's novel is filled with witty dialogue, deep philosophical observations about the nature of human beings and nature, exquisite sentences, and insightful character descriptions. A work of striking moral and political sophistication, Serge's Midnight in the Century is nevertheless a relatively thinly disguised indictment of Stalinism. His protagonists all share the author's political views, and therefore find themselves persecuted by the revolution they once served. Midnight in the Century does offer profoundly illuminating glimpses of the human cost of totalitarianism.
In a sense, the Midnight in the Century's take on Stalinism resembles Koestler's Darkness at Noon or even Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago, which it precedes. But Serge is an unwavering follower of Trotsky, and so his critique of Stalinism is directly concerned with the way in which Stalin and his cronies have betrayed socialism. From Serge's point of view, Stalininism was the Russian Revolution's Thermidor, a form of counterrevolution. Serge's characters do debate the extent to which they owe some modicum of allegiance to the government they helped to bring about. They also debate the historical meaning of Stalinism. Yet ultimately they classify Stalinism as a form of State Capitalism, and avow that true revolutionaries need to "start again" to build a true proletarian government.
In the end, the book tells readers a lot about Soviet terror. We understand that people are put into cells for little reason, or no reason whatsoever. We understand the Old Bolsheviks, Social Revolutionaries, and religious zealots suffer equally at the ends of a brutal state apparatus. We understand that arrests are motivated by jealousy, by chaotic government processes, or crude economic mandates and absurd planning mechanisms which require culprits. We know that Soviet justice is not justice at all, and that even innocent people can be shot with scarcely a pretense of a judicial process. But reading the book now, one is most struck by the viewpoint of a Trotskyite. While we know that Stalin was paranoid about Trotsky and his followers, this book makes one wonder if Stalin wasn't right to fear this form of sustained, informed, courageous, and socialist critique. Communists were steeled in the art of anti-capitalist and anti-colonialist rhetoric. But they were probably much less comfortable debating their erstwhile allies who were actually arguing that the Soviet government had betrayed the true principles of the revolution. Serge's characters charge Stalin and his government with every sort of villainy, from famine, to Chinese massacres, to the rise of fascism, to economic ruin. But their worst charge is that Stalin has ended any pretense of worker democracy and socialist fraternity.
In a sense, the Midnight in the Century's take on Stalinism resembles Koestler's Darkness at Noon or even Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago, which it precedes. But Serge is an unwavering follower of Trotsky, and so his critique of Stalinism is directly concerned with the way in which Stalin and his cronies have betrayed socialism. From Serge's point of view, Stalininism was the Russian Revolution's Thermidor, a form of counterrevolution. Serge's characters do debate the extent to which they owe some modicum of allegiance to the government they helped to bring about. They also debate the historical meaning of Stalinism. Yet ultimately they classify Stalinism as a form of State Capitalism, and avow that true revolutionaries need to "start again" to build a true proletarian government.
In the end, the book tells readers a lot about Soviet terror. We understand that people are put into cells for little reason, or no reason whatsoever. We understand the Old Bolsheviks, Social Revolutionaries, and religious zealots suffer equally at the ends of a brutal state apparatus. We understand that arrests are motivated by jealousy, by chaotic government processes, or crude economic mandates and absurd planning mechanisms which require culprits. We know that Soviet justice is not justice at all, and that even innocent people can be shot with scarcely a pretense of a judicial process. But reading the book now, one is most struck by the viewpoint of a Trotskyite. While we know that Stalin was paranoid about Trotsky and his followers, this book makes one wonder if Stalin wasn't right to fear this form of sustained, informed, courageous, and socialist critique. Communists were steeled in the art of anti-capitalist and anti-colonialist rhetoric. But they were probably much less comfortable debating their erstwhile allies who were actually arguing that the Soviet government had betrayed the true principles of the revolution. Serge's characters charge Stalin and his government with every sort of villainy, from famine, to Chinese massacres, to the rise of fascism, to economic ruin. But their worst charge is that Stalin has ended any pretense of worker democracy and socialist fraternity.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)